<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/OJkQgdjSvoid2NFoB5Qs" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">

Why Class 1 Medical Device Companies Need Design Controls (even if it’s not required)

August 12, 2022

Why Class 1 Medical Device Companies Need Design Controls (even if it’s not required)

I know what you’re thinking. You’ve got a medical device prototype that FDA has categorized as being Class I. 

You’re ready to push forward to manufacturing or marketing the device, since there are no formal requirements for design controls

“So why would I waste time on design controls?”

The fact is that design controls, regardless of regulatory requirements, are massively important to the development of safer devices that fulfill user needs and improve the quality of life.

Don’t believe me? Here are three reasons you still should perform design controls even if it’s not required for compliance.

FREE eBOOK: Click here to download your free PDF copy of our Step-by-step Guide to Determining your Medical Device Classification.

Factoring in exceptions to FDA design control exemptions

FDA mandates design controls in its quality system regulation (QSR) 21 CFR Part 820.30 as part of its current good manufacturing processes (cGMP). The regulation also states design controls are required for all Class II and Class III devices, and requires manufacturers to establish, maintain, and document procedures for design controls.

In general, Class I devices are not required to implement design controls. In fact, 95% of Class I medical devices are exempt from anything above general controls. This is because FDA has determined this risk class of devices pose a very low risk to users and patients.

However, even with exemptions, there’s always an exception to the rule. 21 CFR Part 820.30 also outlines several Class I device types that still require design controls, such as:

  • Surgeon's gloves

  • Protective restraints

  • Tracheobronchial suction catheter 

  • Manual radionuclide applicator system

  • Radionuclide teletherapy source

From a risk perspective, it makes sense that these products would require design controls. For example, surgeon’s gloves routinely have contact with internal organs, and radionuclide teletherapy is an important part of life-saving cancer treatments.  

It’s also clear that the requirements in CFR 820.30 are written with future user needs in mind, as the regulation includes a clause that requires design controls for any Class I devices automated with computer software. With Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) regulations constantly evolving, it’s important to consider that devices that are categorized as Class I today, may end up being Class II tomorrow.

The takeaway here is that a sound design control process prepares you for what’s to come, helping you mitigate risk for any customer complaints that may occur during the post-market phase of the product lifecycle. Just because a device is technically exempt from design controls doesn’t mean you’re exempt from designing products to improve quality of life.

Avoiding design controls limits your device’s potential

At first glance, having a Class I device may seem like an ideal scenario. With minimum requirements for regulatory oversight, manufacturers of low-risk devices can push products to market faster. And why shouldn't they? In the eyes of the law, these are products that pose minimal risk to patients and have next-to-zero impact on overall quality of life. 

But, does low-risk mean low reward? True, the Class I distinction may provide fewer hurdles, but it also significantly restricts how a device can be used. Now, there’s nothing wrong with tongue depressors, and doctors will always need stethoscopes. But when manufacturers choose the Class I designation as part of its regulatory strategy purely for the lack of design controls, it can hinder a device’s potential. 

This also has impacts on the business side of medical devices. The Class I requirements will limit the scope for a device’s intended use and indications for use, including any claims made in marketing materials. 

A good example of this can be found by looking at the wellness apps market, where fitness trackers and meditation apps make general health-related claims rather than references to a specific disease or condition. For instance, a Class I fitness tracker can claim to promote weight loss, but it cannot be used to treat type II diabetes.

However, that all changed in 2018 when the Apple Watch 4 became a Class II medical device. After implementing design controls, required for a 510(k) submission, Apple gained a significant advantage over wearable technology competitors like FitBit, as they were able to develop and market new features for EKG heart rate monitoring and fall detection to the general public. 

Design controls make for better product development

With so much focus on how design controls are regulated, it’s easy to lose focus on the why. Think about the very definition of medical devices, which are products used in the “diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man.” 

Whether they’re patients, providers, or other beneficiaries, your product impacts real people. So, the processes you use to design and manufacture your device must be safe, effective, and managed with the utmost care. Even if a device is categorized as Class I, it has to be ideated, designed, tested, and manufactured around the people who actually use it, which means one thing: 

Design controls matter because they provide critical proof that the device you’ve designed is safe and meets user needs and requirements. 

This is the reason why FDA places such a heavy emphasis on design controls. It’s why ISO 13485 includes them as one of their four components of a QMS. It’s why they’re so intricately connected to risk management standards like ISO 14971. And it’s why traceability and documentation are an absolute must to demonstrate how all these processes are linked.

Regardless of whether your device has regulatory requirements for design control procedures, utilizing them in your product development lifecycle will mitigate risk and ultimately lead to safer medical devices that improve the quality of life for end users.

And, try as I might, it’s hard for me to imagine a better reason than that.

FREE eBOOK: Click here to download your free PDF copy of our Step-by-step Guide to Determining your Medical Device Classification.

Greenlight Guru offers the only multi-level design control solution exclusively for medical devices

Whether you’re obligated to comply with design control requirements, leverage them for a competitive business advantage, or position your product in such a way that makes it easy to implement future improvements, you’ll need a end-to-end MedTech Lifecycle Excellence (MLE) platform that is purpose-built to enable the best possible outcomes for your device.

Greenlight Guru​ is the only all-in-one solution for medical technology companies to deliver safe, effective, and quality products to patients. Our MLE platform integrates cross-functional teams, processes, and data throughout the product lifecycle, giving visibility and traceability beyond compliance requirements to proactively overcome execution gaps and accelerate market success.

Ready to get started? Contact us today for your free, personalized demo →

 

Etienne Nichols is a Medical Device Guru and Mechanical Engineer who loves learning and teaching how systems work together. He has both manufacturing and product development experience, even aiding in the development of combination drug-delivery devices, from startup to Fortune 500 companies and holds a Project...

BONUS eBOOK:
Step-by-step Guide to Medical Device Classification
Download Now
Device Classification