QMSR Explained: What FDA QSR & ISO 13485 Harmonization Means for Medical Device Companies

October 20, 2023

QMSR Explained What FDA QSR & ISO 13485 Harmonization Means for Medical Device Companies-1

On February 23, 2022, FDA released its proposed rule for the new Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR).

The proposed QMSR will be the result of aligning the current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) requirements of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (QSR) with the international consensus standard for medical device quality management systems, ISO 13485:2016.

Cue the applause, because the medical device industry has been buzzing about harmonization between FDA’s QSR and ISO 13485 since 2018, and now it’s finally happening!

Well, almost. The document FDA released is a proposed rule. Right now, FDA asserts that publication of the final rule in the Federal Register will happen December 00, 2023. 

(Yes, you read that “00” correctly. The agency seems to be giving themselves a bit of wiggle room on exactly when it will be published.)

There will also be at least a one-year period between the finalization of the rule and its implementation. That means December 2024 is the earliest the QMSR could go into effect.

Still, this is a major step toward harmonization, and one that medical device professionals have been waiting for for a long time.

So, let’s cut to the chase: why is FDA harmonizing the standards, what do the new changes look like, and what will this change for medical device companies?

BONUS RESOURCE: Download your free copy of our FDA QSR & ISO 13485 QMS Checklist by clicking here.

How does the QMSR differ from the QSR?

FDA is proposing to incorporate ISO 13485 “by reference,” meaning the new QMSR will address certain requirements by referencing their location in ISO 13485:2016. This will, of course, result in substantial changes to 21 CFR Part 820 as we know it. 

FDA states they are “proposing additional definitions, clarifying concepts, and additional requirements, all of which would require compliance within a manufacturer’s QMS in addition to ISO 13485.”

The good news is, many of these changes are semantic in nature and don’t change the basic QMS requirements for medical device companies. For instance, you’ll notice that the term “device master record” is nixed under the current proposal, as it isn’t used in ISO 13485 and the concept behind it is adequately covered in ISO 13485’s requirement for a medical device file. 

On the other hand, there are terms and definitions in ISO 13485 that “would create inconsistencies with the Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act and its implementing regulations.” In these cases, the FDA’s definitions will supersede those of ISO 13485. For example, ‘device’ and ‘labeling’ will supersede the definitions for ‘medical device’ and ‘labelling’ in ISO 13485.

The FDA’s stance on the melding of Part 820’s definitions with those of ISO 13485 can be found in Section 5, Part B of the proposed rule.

The proposed rule also includes several new sections in Part 820:

That last one, 820.45, could use a little more attention. In the proposed QMSR ruling, FDA pointed out that there are device recalls every year related to product labeling and packaging. Clause 7.5.1(e) of ISO 13485 states that “defined operations for labeling and packaging shall be implemented”, but FDA doesn’t seem to think this goes far enough. 

That’s why the agency is introducing a new labeling and packaging clause to the proposed Part 820. 

Section 820.45 will require “procedures that provide a detailed description of labeling and packaging activities to ensure the integrity, inspection, storage, and operations for labeling and repackaging.”

The main items Section 820.45 will require are: 

  • UDI or UPC
  • Expiration date
  • Storage instructions
  • Handling instructions
  • Processing instructions  

Keep in mind, this is all in addition to 21 CFR Part 801 - Labeling, which lays out the specific requirements for the labeling of medical devices. 

December 2024 will be here sooner than you think, so it’s worth it to start looking at your current labeling and packaging procedures now—and start getting them in line with what will be expected.

Why is FDA proposing QSR & ISO 13485 harmonization?

While ISO 13485 has been revised repeatedly over the past two decades, the QSR remains nearly unchanged since it was released in 1996. 

In its proposed rule, FDA admits that “regulatory expectations for a QMS have evolved since the current Part 820 was implemented over 20 years ago,” and that, “By proposing to incorporate ISO 13485 by reference, we are seeking to explicitly require current internationally recognized regulatory expectations for QMS for devices subject to FDA’s jurisdiction.”

FDA also notes that it has paid attention to the revisions to ISO 13485 over the years, and the agency feels the 2016 version of the standard is closely aligned with requirements of 21 CFR Part 820. All ISO standards are reviewed every five years to decide whether they need updating, and the current version of ISO 13485 was last confirmed in 2020. 

FDA repeatedly mentions in its proposed rule that the QMS requirements in Part 820 and ISO 13485 are substantially similar, “Where ISO 13485 diverges from the current part 820, these differences are generally consistent with the overall intent and purposes behind FDA's regulation of QMSs.”

As such, it makes sense for FDA to harmonize the two and eliminate the redundancy and inefficiency that many medical device companies face while attempting to satisfy the requirements of both the QSR and ISO 13485. 

The agency believes that harmonization will further the cause of “regulatory simplicity and global harmonization and should reduce burdens on a regulated industry, thereby providing patients more efficient access to necessary devices.” 

FDA also estimates that harmonization will save medical device companies at least $439 million over the next decade by reducing the compliance burden on medical device companies that currently have to comply with both standards.

What does the FDA QSR transition to ISO 13485 mean for medical device manufacturers?

While this may seem like a lot of change for medical device manufacturers, it’s important to keep in mind that FDA already believes ISO 13485 to be substantially similar to the current QSR. 

It’s a good idea to keep an eye on this proposed rule and any revisions that may occur prior to December 00), but this shouldn’t result in a total overhaul of your QMS. This harmonization is more about making life easier for everyone. 

With that said, there are a few things to keep in mind regarding the proposed rule to harmonize the FDA QSR with ISO 13485:2016:

  • Once the rule is finalized, there will be a one-year waiting period before it goes into effect.

  • The proposed rule may also result in changes to the current Quality System Inspection Technique (QSIT) to make it consistent with the new QMSR requirements.

  • FDA is proposing to harmonize the QSR with ISO 13485:2016, which is the latest version of the ISO standard. Any future revision to ISO 13485 would first need to be evaluated by FDA before being incorporated into the QMSR.

  • Just because QMSR will be harmonized with ISO 13485, that doesn’t mean you’ll be issued an ISO 13485 certification of conformance after an inspection. And if you already are ISO 13485 certified, that won’t exempt you from FDA inspections.

How can MedTech companies prepare for the Quality Management System Regulation?

December of 2024 may sound like it’s pretty far off today, but that actually makes this the perfect time to begin thinking about how you’ll get compliant with the QMSR.

If you’re not ISO 13485 certified

If you’re based in the US and currently only following the QSR, then you may want to pursue ISO 13485 certification as harmonization approaches. At the very least, you should spend some time comparing 21 CFR Part 820 with ISO 13485:2016 to get a better understanding of what you’re currently doing and what you’ll be required to do by the QMSR.

When you compare the two, you’ll notice that one of the biggest differences between ISO 13485:2016 and the QSR is that the international standard places a greater emphasis on risk management

FDA notes that they expect manufacturers to integrate risk management activities throughout their QMS and across the product lifecycle, but they also acknowledge that ISO 13485 more explicitly establishes those requirements. The incorporation of ISO 13485 by reference will ensure the new QMSR has a more overt stance on the importance of risk management in design controls.

At Greenlight Guru, we understand that risk management is a fundamental aspect of the entire medical device lifecycle, which is why we built Risk Solutions, a first-of-its-kind complete risk management software for MedTech Companies. 

If you’re already ISO 13485 certified

If you’re already certified to ISO 13485:2016, that’s a great start—but it doesn’t mean you’ll automatically be in compliance with the QMSR. Remember, FDA is adding these new sections on top of what’s currently in ISO 13485:

It’s a good idea to get familiar with these sections of the QMSR now and consider how you’ll achieve compliance with their requirements, even if you’re currently in conformity with ISO 13485:2016.

BONUS RESOURCE: Download your free copy of our FDA QSR & ISO 13485 QMS Checklist by clicking here.

Modernize your QMS with Greenlight Guru

While you’re thinking about the changes you need to make to comply with the QMSR, it also makes sense to take a step back and look at the QMS solution you’re using. 

Is it built specifically for MedTech? Does it help you achieve truly paperless audits? Does it come with a top-notch team of medical device experts who are always ready to help?

If you answered ‘no’ to any of those questions, it’s probably time to modernize your QMS. 

At Greenlight Guru, we built our eQMS solution for MedTech companies because we know that the ever-changing standards and regulations—like QMSR—are a lot to handle for even the most seasoned medical device companies. That’s why our QMS comes pre-validated per FDA and ISO best practices—so you don’t have to worry about customization for compliance. 

So if you’re ready to experience the power of a purpose-built QMS, then get your free demo of Greenlight Guru today!


 

Looking for a design control solution to help you bring safer medical devices to market faster with less risk? Click here to take a quick tour of Greenlight Guru's Medical Device QMS software

Etienne Nichols is a Medical Device Guru and Mechanical Engineer who loves learning and teaching how systems work together. He has both manufacturing and product development experience, even aiding in the development of combination drug-delivery devices, from startup to Fortune 500 companies and holds a Project...

FREE RESOURCE:
FDA QSR & ISO 13485:2016 QMS Checklist
Download Now
FDA QSR & ISO 134852016 QMS Internal Audit Checklist - Slide-in Cover
Search Results for:
    Load More Results